There
have always been refugees: people who are forced to flee their respective home
countries by armed conflict, persecution or repression. They must find new
homes and new lives abroad. But there is something different about the current
refugee crisis. This crisis is more severe, pervasive and larger than anything
the world has seen in decades. This disaster is of global proportions and the situation
is truly desperate for millions. It is the biggest humanitarian emergency of
our era and it is still unfolding.
The
origin of this crisis is multifactorial and rooted in many different,
apparently unrelated conflicts across the globe. The rise of extremist, religiously and
ideologically motivated terrorist groups in the Middle East, like ISIS, Bashar
Assad’s brutal regime in Syria, Al Qaeda and Western intervention in Iraq have all played a role. These groups use unparalleled violence and brutality to achieve
primacy over their rivals.
People
are fleeing their homelands in panic, by the millions, in dangerous,
overcrowded dinghies, without status and recognition, rather than be killed,
taken as prisoners, enslaved or face political and religious persecution. Many of them, including children, have ended
up drowned off the coast of countries that have either refused, or prohibited
their entry. The luckier ones live in horribly difficult conditions in
cramped, unsafe refugee camps with no prospects for jobs or education. The trip
they make is so perilous in part because Western governments, wanting to
discourage all forms of uncontrolled migration, have let it be that way as a
matter of deliberate policy.
The current refugee
crisis calls for a global response and all of us must contribute in addressing
it.
It is a worldwide problem — one whose scale and severity is unmatched since
World War 2.
Politics
within Europe are unusually hostile to refugees and migrants at the moment given
the rise of right wing parties that drum up paranoia against outsiders especially
Muslims. This is why the refugees’ plight has become even more acute as most of
them have tried to enter the Western world via Europe. This is why they are in
crisis, stuck in camps or dying in the Mediterranean rather than resettling
safely in Europe.
The
US is usually pretty good about resettling refugees — it resettles about 50,000
to 70,000 a year, a number that has been slowly rising since 9/11 — but so far has
badly lagged behind in resettling Middle Eastern refugees. Since 2011, the UN
refugee agency has referred 17,000 Syrians to the US for resettlement. The US
response has been tepid and we have resettled only about 9 percent of those. The US process for applying for
resettlement can take up to 24 months for Syrians, due in part to extensive
background checks and extraordinary paperwork requirements.
The
International Rescue Committee is renewing it’s call for the United States
government to resettle 65,000 Syrian refugees before the end of 2016. The
recent U.S. commitment to accept around 10,000 Syrian refugees is only a first
step toward alleviating their suffering. Much more is needed. It is nothing
compared to the more than 800,000 Southeast Asian, mostly Vietnamese, the United States
accepted after the end of the Vietnam War.
As citizens of the wealthiest, most powerful and prosperous
nation in the history of mankind and by virtue of a shared humanity, it is our
responsibility, nay, our duty to open our doors and our hearts and welcome more
desperate refugee families to safety and freedom within our communities. Some of our foreign policy decisions have been responsible for increasing
instability and, even, the inadvertent rise of extremist groups in the Middle
East. We must do our best to help those who are suffering because we cannot
remain indifferent and abdicate our moral responsibility.
As psychiatrists, we know that these human beings have been
traumatized in unimaginable, horrific ways. They have experienced and survived
devastating and profoundly stressful events. It begins with war: the
destruction of their homes and communities through the use of extreme and
systematic violence, personal threats, attacks, persecutions and killings. This
is quickly followed by the trauma of the forced and perilous migration itself
which many of them don’t even survive. Those who survive must then face the
traumatic loss of their homeland, their aspirations, friends and family, while
struggling to cope with squalid conditions in makeshift refugee camps with no
hope of an economic or educational future. Sometimes they are subject to racism,
dehumanization and depersonalization and forced to endure almost prison like
conditions. Desperate conditions in some camps lead to malnutrition and further
disease. No human being, ideally, wants to leave their
homeland, if they have the chance to live a safe and secure existence. And no
mother would put her son on a rickety boat unless she thought the water and
what lay beyond was safer than the land.
Therefore, it is our duty firstly, to inform the
public about the emotional, psychological, and spiritual impact in addition to
the physical cost these refugees have had to pay. We must then tell our
representatives in Congress what we think about the refugee crisis and urge
them to ease restrictions on refugees. Their applications and security
clearances must be prioritized. It’s unacceptable that refugees should wait for
years in these camps while their applications are vetted.
In addition, we should also offer our
services and expertise to attend to the mental health needs of newly arrived,
psychically devastated, physically and emotionally traumatized refugees in our
communities in a way that is linguistically and culturally
appropriate. We should also advocate for the development of home based,
school based, office based and community based programs to attend to the
medical and mental health needs of the refugees and help them integrate into
society with housing and jobs. This is how we uphold our commitment to
justice, equality, humanitarianism, universal human rights, human dignity, and
global mental health.
Sadly, the current crisis is unfolding in the context
of a strange, culturally paranoid, virulently anti-immigrant moment in American
politics. Terrorism and crime are being conflated with and blamed on immigration.
Although, even a figure like Donald Trump has expressed his support for
resettling refugees, some politicians have warned that ISIS could exploit any
Syrian refugee resettlement program to use it as a "a federally funded
jihadi pipeline."
This is usual fear mongering. The Obama
administration knows this isn't true. These are families stuck in camps
we're talking about -- they include torture survivors, war crime victims,
victims of sexual assault, people with special medical needs and women who head
households. In almost all cases these are people fleeing from terrorism.
They are displaced, powerless, and voiceless. However, the administration is
unwilling to overcome the political opposition.
Through our representatives in Congress, we must
compel our government which appears, at the moment, more concerned with
protecting itself politically against the very unlikely risk of letting in potential
jihadis than with saving the lives of thousands of Syrian families to respond
to this crisis in a way that is consistent with our morality and our values.
The U.S. itself a nation of immigrants fleeing religious
persecution has historically been the world leader in recognizing the moral
obligation to resettle refugees. We cannot afford to shut our eyes and sit
out the biggest refugee crisis since WW2. As the German and Turkish governments
calmly take in a million refugees each in 2015, it is vital for the U.S. to
step up its response.
As psychiatrists, Americans and citizens of the world, the
clarion call of conscience is loud and clear. What morality demands is
indisputable. People suffering hunger, illness,
pain, anxiety, trauma and other dire conditions should be given every aid
available, and those who live relatively comfortably should endure the mere,
but often intensely rewarding discomfort of providing it.
Opening our doors and our hearts to people fleeing war, death
and poverty, is the right thing to do and our moral responsibility. We must
hold true to our obligations in the world and to the values we profess: compassion, empathy, generosity and mercy. It would be unethical for us
to stay silent or passive on an issue with such serious, life and death
implications for so many people.
No comments:
Post a Comment